History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oney v. Needham
6 Ohio St. 2d 154
Ohio
1966
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court’s attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other errors assigned in and not passed upon by that court.

Judgment reversed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Oney v. Needham
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 11, 1966
Citation: 6 Ohio St. 2d 154
Docket Number: No. 39893
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.