21 F.R.D. 161 | S.D.N.Y. | 1953
Plaintiffs move for an order striking the answer of Marcus D. Beard, one of the defendants, for his failure to appear for examination on oral deposition pursuant to a notice dated January 7, 1952.
Beard’s attorneys oppose this motion, citing F.R.Civ.P. 45(d) (2), 28 U.S.C.A., upon the ground that he resides in North Carolina and the moving papers fail to state that a subpoena was served upon him. That rule, when read in conjunction with F.R.Civ.P. 26(a), applies only to the examination of a witness. Subpoena need not be served upon a party for the taking of his deposition pursuant to notice.
Defendant’s attorneys also oppose this motion upon the ground that their “files fail to disclose” that a copy of such notice was served upon them and they do not recall having received or seen it. However, plaintiffs’ attorney states by affidavit that a copy thereof was served by mail upon defendant’s attorneys on January 7, 1952. Such service was complete on mailing.
If the examination in this district of defendant Beard constituted a hardship, he should have seasonably moved for appropriate relief
Under these circumstances, plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendant Beard’s answer is granted unless said defendant appears for the taking of his deposition upon oral examination at the office of the Clerk of this court, Room 601, United States Courthouse, within thirty days from the entry of an order on this motion.
Settle order.
. Collins v. Wayland, 9 Cir., 139 F.2d. 677, certiorari denied 322 U.S. 744, 64 S.Ct. 1151, 88 L.Ed. 1576.
. F.R.Civ.P. 5(b).
. F.R.Civ.P. 30b.
. F.R.Civ.P. 37(d).