One Ten West Fortieth Associates v. Isabel Ardee, Inc.One Ten West Fortieth Associates v. Isabel Ardee, Inc.
The parties’ actions, which included tenant taking possession, landlord cashing the security deposit, and tenant making authorized renovations to the premises, all sufficiently evidenced the parties’ intent to convey an interest in the real estate sufficient to constitute “delivery” (219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander‘s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506, 511-512 [1979]). Given that the lease was valid, tenant was liable for the unpaid rent sought. Further, pursuant to the express terms of the guaranty, guarantor was liable for attorney‘s fees for this action. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Renwick, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.