Oms v. GoordOms v. Goord
Lahtinen, J. Proceeding pursuant to
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was subjected to a search at which time a brown substance ultimately proven to be heroin was found on his person. He was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with possession of narcotics. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charge and penalties were imposed. Petitioner exhausted his administrative remedies and then commenced this
The crux of petitioner‘s argument is that the correction officer who confiscated the contraband did not personally make a notation on the form which requested testing of the contraband and documented the chain of custody (see