History
  • No items yet
midpage
Olt v. Porterfield
19 Ohio App. 2d 211
Ohio Ct. App.
1969
Check Treatment

This is an appeal on questions of law from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming an assessment of sales tax against appellant, doing business as Charlie Olt Water Hauling Service, 435 North Washington Boulevard, Hamilton, Ohio, for a period from June 1, 1963, to June 30, 1967.

This court is bound by the record before the Board of Tax Appeals and may not substitute its judgment for that of the board even if inclined to be more liberal in finding exceptions from sales tax, but is limited to decision of the question: was the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, which is the subject of this appeal, unreasonable and unlawful.

Appellant made no separation in the price of a load into a charge for water and a charge for delivery, so that, under the statutes, the transaction amounted to a sale. *Page 212

This court, in Strosnider v. Donahue, Case No. 312, Clermont County, affirmed, per curiam, an assessment in an identical water hauling case.

We are, therefore, unable to find from the record before us that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

SHANNON, P. J., and HESS, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Olt v. Porterfield
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 16, 1969
Citation: 19 Ohio App. 2d 211
Docket Number: 1317
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.