SC 16218 | Conn. | Nov 2, 1999
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 506" court="Conn. App. Ct." date_filed="1999-08-17" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/olson-v-accessory-controls--equipment-corp-7858688?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7858688">54 Conn. App. 506 (AC 18324), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly had determined that certain communications between*918 counsel for the named defendant and an expert consulting firm retained by the named defendant were covered by the attorney-client privilege?”