Oliver v. Kantor

Jan 25, 1940
Versions:10 A.2d 732
124 N.J.L. 131
1940 N.J. LEXIS 259
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.