History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oliver M. Bond and Herta R. Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.
926 F.2d 1573
| 11th Cir. | 1991
|
Check Treatment

926 F.2d 1573

Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-8898.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 28, 1991.

E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Duross Fitzpatrick, District Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court's dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F. Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990).

2

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Oliver M. Bond and Herta R. Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Mar 28, 1991
Citation: 926 F.2d 1573
Docket Number: 90-8898
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.