History
  • No items yet
midpage
Olander Bynum v. Katy Poole
690 F. App'x 118
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olander R. Bynum, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Olander R. Bynum seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for compensation and for default judgment and granting the defendant’s motion to set aside entry of default. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Bynum seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Olander Bynum v. Katy Poole
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 26, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 118
Docket Number: 17-6100
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.