History
  • No items yet
midpage
Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n
362 So. 2d 713
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1978
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record on appeal in the instant case does not contain a transcript of either the trial below or the evidentiary hearing on attorneys’ fees. Because the final judgment in foreclosure appealed relates directly to these matters, we do not have before us an adequate record upon which to review the actions of the trial court. Accordingly, we must assume that the judgment appealed is correct; therefore, we affirm. See, e. g., Williamson v. Williamson, 335 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Strickland v. Lewis, 328 So.2d 244 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); Dade County Board of Public Instruction v. Foster, 307 So.2d 502 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Butler v. Metropolitan Dade County, 298 So.2d 552 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Ass'n
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 26, 1978
Citation: 362 So. 2d 713
Docket Number: No. 77-1484
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.