History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Dye
572 N.E.2d 666
Ohio
1991
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We adopt the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and will accept the parties’ strong recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated Canons 3(A)(2), 3(A)(3), 3(A)(4), 3(A)(5), and 3(B)(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Dye
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 3, 1991
Citation: 572 N.E.2d 666
Docket Number: No. 90-2089
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.