History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ohio Oil Co. v. State
150 Ind. 694
Ind.
1898
Check Treatment
McCabe, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover certain penalties prescribed by the act concerning natural gas and oil, approved March 4,1893, (Acts 1893, p. 300). The circuit court overruled a demurrer for want of sufficient facts to both paragraphs of the complaint, and also sustained a like demurrer to an answer of the appellant in a single paragraph in confession and avoidance. And the defendant failing to amend its answer or plead over, and electing to stand on the same, the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the penalties sued for, and attorney’s fees, on evidence of the value of such attorney’s fees.

The same objections are urged against the sufficiency of the complaint, and the same reasons are urged in support of the sufficiency of the answer, involving the constitutionality and proper construction of the act above referred to, that were urged, discussed and de*695oided in the case of State v. Ohio Oil Co., ante, 21. And all the questions here raised were decided against the present appellant in that case. The judgment in this case is therefore affirmed on the authority of that case.

Case Details

Case Name: Ohio Oil Co. v. State
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 16, 1898
Citation: 150 Ind. 694
Docket Number: No. 18,498
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.