History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oglethorpe Co. v. Carmack
223 Ga. 128
Ga.
1967
Check Treatment
Grice, Justice.

This case is here upon grant of certiorari from the Court of Appeals. Two rulings of that court are complained of, but under our view it is necessary to deal only with the denial of the applicant’s motion in that court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the transcript of evidence was not filed within 30 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, as required by Section 11 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 26; Code Ann. § 6-806).

The record shows that the notice of appeal was filed on October 18, 1965, and the transcript of evidence was filed in the trial court on July 18, 1966, nine months later. It does not appear that application was made to the trial judge for an extension of time to file the transcript or that any- extension was granted. In Davis v. Davis, 222 Ga. 579 (151 SE2d 123), where the delay was approximately six months and the facts almost identical with those here, this court held that the motion to dismiss must be granted because of appellant’s failure to follow mandatory requirements of the Appellate Practice Act, supra. That case controls this one.

Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the motion to dismiss is

Reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Oglethorpe Co. v. Carmack
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 23, 1967
Citation: 223 Ga. 128
Docket Number: 23873
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.