Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon, No. 92-419

No. 92-419 | Ohio | Sep 2, 1992

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules, as found by the board. We also concur with the board’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.