History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise
707 N.E.2d 852
Ohio
1999
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The normal sanction for misappropriation of client funds is disbarment. Disciplinary Counsel v. Connaughton (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 644, 645, 665 N.E.2d 675, 676, and cases cited therein. However, on some occasions because of mitigating circumstances, we have given weight to a board recommendation of a lesser sanction. Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 55, 693 N.E.2d 1080. We do so in this case. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 24, 1999
Citation: 707 N.E.2d 852
Docket Number: No. 98-2213
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.