History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo
652 N.E.2d 976
Ohio
1995
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 2-102(A)(4) and (C); 2-106(A); 3 — 101(B); 6-101(A)(3); and 7-101(A)(3); and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). We further concur in the recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio indefinitely. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents and would disbar respondent.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 23, 1995
Citation: 652 N.E.2d 976
Docket Number: No. 94-2645
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In