Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro, 71 Ohio St. 3d 391

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Harry J. DePietro. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

---

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting. The facts as presented in this case do not merit disciplinary action. However, respondent did agree with the panel’s recommendation of a public reprimand. If there are some other facts that yielded this result, they should be revealed to this court. If not, the case should be dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Dec 30, 1994

Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 391; 643 N.E.2d 1145; No. 94-2253

Docket Number: No. 94-2253

Court Abbreviation: Ohio