History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera
68 Ohio St. 3d 478
| Ohio | 1994
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of fact' and conclusions of law of the board. However, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law without credit for time served. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents., Douglas, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I would concur with the recommendations of the board.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 23, 1994
Citation: 68 Ohio St. 3d 478
Docket Number: No. 93-2180
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.