History
  • No items yet
midpage
68 Ohio St. 3d 12
Ohio
1993
Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered to serve a one-year suspension from the practice of law in Ohio, with such suspension to have begun on February 19, 1992. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 8, 1993
Citations: 68 Ohio St. 3d 12; 623 N.E.2d 28; No. 93-1335
Docket Number: No. 93-1335
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In