History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton
66 Ohio St. 3d 163
| Ohio | 1993
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After reading the testimonial letters submitted by respondent, we agree with the findings and recommendation of the board. We hereby publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 28, 1993
Citation: 66 Ohio St. 3d 163
Docket Number: No. 92-2527
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.