History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton
570 N.E.2d 1100
Ohio
1991
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 24, 1991
Citation: 570 N.E.2d 1100
Docket Number: No. 90-1706
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.