Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102

Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Apr 24, 1991

Citations: 59 Ohio St. 3d 102; 570 N.E.2d 1100; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944; No. 90-1706

Docket Number: No. 90-1706

Court Abbreviation: Ohio