History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane
56 Ohio St. 3d 38
| Ohio | 1990
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We find respondent’s conduct to be a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, without credit for the time already suspended. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 12, 1990
Citation: 56 Ohio St. 3d 38
Docket Number: No. 89-1555
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.