Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams, 51 Ohio St. 3d 36

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: May 9, 1990

Citations: 51 Ohio St. 3d 36; 553 N.E.2d 1082; 1990 Ohio LEXIS 205; No. 89-2171

Docket Number: No. 89-2171

Court Abbreviation: Ohio