History
  • No items yet
midpage
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods
28 Ohio St. 3d 245
Ohio
1986
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that respondent was convicted of theft, forgery and uttering in violation of R.C. 2913.02 and 2913.31. Under Gov. Bar R. V(9)(b), a certified copy of the judgment entry of conviction is conclusive evidence of the commission of these offenses. This court accordingly concurs with the board’s finding that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6). Wherefore, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. Costs shall be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 24, 1986
Citation: 28 Ohio St. 3d 245
Docket Number: D.D. No. 86-23
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.