History
  • No items yet
midpage
28 Ohio St. 3d 245
Ohio
1986
Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that respondent was convicted of theft, forgery and uttering in violation of R.C. 2913.02 and 2913.31. Under Gov. Bar R. V(9)(b), a certified copy of the judgment entry of conviction is conclusive evidence of the commission of these offenses. This court accordingly concurs with the board’s finding that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6). Wherefore, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. Costs shall be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 24, 1986
Citations: 28 Ohio St. 3d 245; 503 N.E.2d 746; 28 Ohio B. 325; 1986 Ohio LEXIS 828; D.D. No. 86-23
Docket Number: D.D. No. 86-23
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods, 28 Ohio St. 3d 245