History
  • No items yet
midpage
Offer v. McMillan
101 Cal. App. 2d 840
Cal. Ct. App.
1951
Check Treatment
DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs have appealed *841error. There is no basis for a discussion of this point, for we cannot take the opinion into account. “The findings and conclusions constitute the final decision of the court and an oral or written opinion cannot be resorted to for the purpose of impeaching or gainsaying the findings and judgment.” (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71 Cal.App.2d 777, 781 [163 P.2d 756].)

The judgment is affirmed. Appeal from order denying new trial dismissed.

Adams, P. J., and Peek, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Offer v. McMillan
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 23, 1951
Citation: 101 Cal. App. 2d 840
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7920
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.