History
  • No items yet
midpage
O'Donohue v. Leggett
29 N.Y. St. Rep. 983
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1889
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

A consideration of this case leads to the conclusion that the â– questions presented are sufficiently covered by the opinion delivered upon the former appeal. An examination of it did not disclose the existence of any additional facts or circumstances requiring a different disposition than that mentioned, and therefore the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: O'Donohue v. Leggett
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 2, 1889
Citation: 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 983
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.