Odom v. Soles, 01-6669

01-6669 | 4th Cir. | Aug 2, 2001

trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-00-841-AM) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony L. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony L. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Odom v. Soles, No. CA-00-841-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3, 2001; entered Apr. 4, 2001). We deny Odom’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2