History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oden v. Coco
249 U.S. 587
SCOTUS
1919
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for Want of jurisdiction upon the authority of; (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218. (2) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, &c., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Case Details

Case Name: Oden v. Coco
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 14, 1919
Citation: 249 U.S. 587
Docket Number: No. 704
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.