History
  • No items yet
midpage
O'Dell v. State
95 Ga. 333
Ga.
1895
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, Justice.

There are many grounds in the motion for a new trial. After examining them all carefully, we are satisfied they are without substantial merit. We think this will appear, without argument, from an examination of the reporter’s statement in which these grounds are set forth. The evidence clearly and satisfactorily shows that the accused was guilty. This being so, the Supreme Court will not diligently search for errors upon which to predicate the granting of a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: O'Dell v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 27, 1895
Citation: 95 Ga. 333
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.