Oddo v. OddoOddo v. Oddo
Mrs. Oddo, age 50, is a clerical specialist who has been employed by the Municipal Court of New Orleans for approximately two years. Her gross income is $655.38 per month; her net income is $421.72 per month. Additionally, she receives another $37.00 per month in tenure payments. She lives with her mother in a home which is part of the community property aсquired by Mr. and Mrs. Oddo during their marriage. Mrs. Oddo‘s mother, who has been renting the house for seven or eight years, pаys $100.00 per month in rent, which Mrs. Oddo uses to pay the $97.00 monthly mortgage note. Additionally, Mrs. Oddo‘s mother pays the entire electricity and gas bill. Mrs. Oddo testified that she was repairing an apartment located on the property and would soon move into it. She testified that she intends to pay one-half of the monthly mortgage note and one-half of the utility bills when she moves into that apartment. Mrs. Oddo claimed monthly expеnses of $1,285.10, itemized as follows:
Rent or Mortgage ............. $ 45.00 House Insurance .............. 21.00 Utilities .................... 80.00 Telephone .................... 20.00 Maintenanсe and Repair ....... 50.00 Yard Maintenance ............. 20.00 Exterminating Co. ............ 15.00 Food ......................... 150.00 Clothing ..................... 50.00 Medical ...................... 16.00 Dental ....................... 50.00 Drugs ........................ 15.00 Hospital ..................... 10.00 Lunch Money .................. 60.00 Auto replacement ............. 250.00 Repair and Maintenance ....... 50.00 Gasoline ..................... 80.00 Auto Insurance ............... 29.50 Cosmetiсs and Drugstore ...... 20.00 Haircuts ..................... 20.00 Cleaners ..................... 10.00 Appliance Repair ............. 5.00 Clubs ........................ 30.00 Newspaper .................... 3.60 Pets ......................... 15.00 Gifts ........................ 20.00 Church ....................... 25.00 Miscellanеous ................ 125.00
Alimony after divorce is authorized by
With a net income of approximately $421.72 per month, plus $37.00 in mоnthly tenure payments, Mrs. Oddo clearly demonstrated her need for alimony. The record reveals that the reasonable monthly expenses necessary for defendant‘s support exceedеd her income.
It is also obvious, however, that many of the expenses listed by Mrs. Oddo do not fit into the categories allowed for purposes of determining alimony after divorce. The expenses listed for cosmetics, haircuts, clubs, newspaper, pets, gifts and church, totaling $133.60 monthly, are not included within thоse types of expenses which are to be considered for purposes of alimony after divorce. Similarly, no explanation was offered for the $125.00 miscellaneous expense listed and it should not be included for purposes of computing what Mrs. Oddo needs for her maintenance. Finally, while reasonable automobile or travel expenses are necessary for a spouse‘s maintenance, we note that Mrs. Oddo‘s list contains a $250.00 per month automobile replacemеnt expense as well as $50.00 per month for automobile repairs and maintenance, $80.00 for gasoline and $29.50 per month for automobile insurance. We conclude that the $250.00 per month automobilе replacement expense is excessive and should not be included in what is reasonably necessary for Mrs. Oddo‘s maintenance.1
Mrs. Oddo‘s list of monthly expenses totaled $1,285.10. From that amount should be subtraсted those items which are not properly considered as necessary for her maintenance, as well as the $125.00 miscellaneous expense and the $250.00 automobile replacement expense. This leaves a total of $776.50 which is actually necessary for Mrs. Oddo‘s maintenance. Her mоnthly net income is $421.72, leaving her in need of an additional $354.78 per month. When we considered the fact thаt she also receives an additional $37.00 per month in tenure payments, the trial court‘s award of $275.00 рer month in alimony did not exceed the bounds of its discretion.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of thе district court is affirmed. All costs of these proceedings are to be paid by defendant-apрellant.
AFFIRMED.