Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC v. SiameOcwen Loan Servicing LLC v. Siame
Michael Kennedy Karlson, New York, for appellant.
Fein, Such & Crane, LLP, Westbury (Andrew M. Grenell of counsel), for respondent.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Doris M. Gonzalez, J.), entered January 4, 2019, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff lender‘s motion for a judgment
While defendant Henry Siame‘s fourth affirmative defense asserted that lender failed to provide the notice of default and Real Property Actions and Procedure Law (RPAPL) 90-day notice, defendant did not assert that lender failed to demonstrate that it served him with either notice, thereby waiving these arguments by failing to raise them in his answer with the requisite specificity and particularity required by
Lender‘s notice of default complied with paragraph 22 of the consolidated mortgage, and
The attachment of the subject note to the verified complaint was sufficient to establish that lender had physical possession of the note prior to commencement of this action (see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Knowles, 151 AD3d 596, 597 [1st Dept 2017]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: JULY 2, 2020
CLERK