JUDGMENT
This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was considered on the record, briefs, and oral argument of the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the March 27, 2001 order of the district court is affirmed. The government submitted extensive declarations to the effect that the Department of Defense is still revising Draft Subchapter 1230. The district court acted well within its discretion in deeming the Department’s factual allegations to be admitted in light of appellants’ counsel’s failure to submit the statement of disputed material facts required by Local Civil Rule 7.1(h). Cf. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner,
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
