History
  • No items yet
midpage
O'Connor v. State
548 So. 2d 276
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions on Counts I and II. However, we reverse the sentence imposed on Count II because the trial court gave neither oral nor written reasons for its departure from the recommended guidelines sentence.

AFFIRMED AS TO COUNT I; REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RE-SENTENCING AS TO COUNT II.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: O'Connor v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 30, 1989
Citation: 548 So. 2d 276
Docket Number: No. 88-2493
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.