38 Mass. App. Dec. 163 | Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. | 1967
This is an action of tort for conversion, brought in the District Court of Springfield, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the value of certain personal articles allegedly converted by the defendant. The judge found for the defendant.
At the trial there was evidence that the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant on a weekly basis; that the plaintiff was away from the apartment during November and part
At the close of the evidence and before final argument, the plaintiff filed requests for rulings of law. The judge allowed the plaintiff’s requests and found for the defendant but filed no other written findings. The plaintiff contends the finding for the defendant is inconsistent with the evidence and with his granting of the plaintiff’s requests.
In case of an inconsistency between the rulings of the trial judge and Ms findings on the evidence “the proper ‘remedy is not a report but a motion to correct the inconsistency or a motion for a new trial. ’ ’ ’
Cook v. Kozlowski, 357 Mass. 708. Vieira v. Balsamo, 328 Mass. 37, 39. Kesley v. Hampton
The evidence warranted the finding made by the trial judge. The report is to be dismissed.