History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ockerman v. Wise
202 F.2d 144
6th Cir.
1953
Check Treatment

202 F.2d 144

OCKERMAN,
v.
WISE.

No. 11664.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1953.

Kiss & Kiss, Cleveland, Ohio, Wm. B. Martin, Lexington, Ky., for appellant.

Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This cause has been heard and considered on the record, on the briefs of the contending parties, and on the oral arguments of attorneys representing the parties;

2

And it appearing, without dispute, that the appellant administrator and the appellee (defendant) are citizens and residents of the State of Kentucky and were such at the time of the institution of this action and that, therefore, there was no diversity of citizenship to vest jurisdiction in the district court, see Mecom, Adm'r, v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Company, 284 U.S. 183, 52 S.Ct. 84, 76 L.Ed. 233; and Mason v. Helms, D.C.E.D.S.C., 97 F.Supp. 312;

3

The judgment of the district court, sustaining appellee's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, is hereby affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ockerman v. Wise
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 16, 1953
Citation: 202 F.2d 144
Docket Number: 11664_1
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.