History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ochoa v. State
424 S.W.2d 642
Tex. Crim. App.
1968
Check Treatment
424 S.W.2d 642 (1968)

Isidro Sanchez OCHOA, Jr., Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 41096.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

February 21, 1968.

Pena & McDonald by L. Aron Pena, Edinburg, for appellant.

Oscar B. McInnis, Dist. Atty., Edinburg, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary; the punishment was assessed at two years.

The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 728.

The grounds attempted to be presented in appellant's brief filed in this court do not raise any constitutional questions.

Nothing appears in the record which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

No question of indigency is raised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ochoa v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 21, 1968
Citation: 424 S.W.2d 642
Docket Number: 41096
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.