History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oberholtzer v. Huffman
234 N.C. 399
| N.C. | 1951
|
Check Treatment
67 S.E.2d 263 (1951)
234 N.C. 399

OBERHOLTZER
v.
HUFFMAN.

No. 316.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 31, 1951.

Theodore F. Cummings, Hickory, for plaintiff appellant.

George D. Hovey, Hickory, and G. A. Warlick, Newton, for defendant appellee.

BARNHILL, Justice.

Special damages, that is, damages which are the natural but not necessary result of the alleged wrongful act of the defendant, must be pleaded with sufficient particularity to put the defendant on notice. Conrad v. Shuford, 174 N.C. 719, 94 S.E. 424; Binder v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 222 N.C. 512, 23 S.E.2d 894. This the plaintiff has done. The allegations stricken are a proper and necessary part of his complaint. Hence the order striking same must be

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Oberholtzer v. Huffman
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 31, 1951
Citation: 234 N.C. 399
Docket Number: 316
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.