453 So. 2d 147 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1984
Oatsvall appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. His motion alleged that his
Appellant’s motion appears to be facially sufficient. Therefore, it was error for the trial court to summarily deny the motion, and this cause is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to attach portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief or to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the allegations presented in the motion. See: State v. Reynolds, 238 So.2d 598 (Fla.1970); Wilcox v. State, 267 So.2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).
REVERSED and REMANDED.