Oatley v. Southland Resorts, Inc.Oatley v. Southland Resorts, Inc.
In this case Plaintiffs seek a recision of a contract to purchase from Defendant “Lot no. 40-41 of Highland Lakeshore Estates, * * * East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana.”
On December 20, 1961 Defendant filed answer to the suit denying generally the allegations of Plaintiffs’ original petition and Donald T. Oatley’s amended and supplemental petition. On February 13, 1962 Defendant filed a reconventional demand against Donald T. Oatley seeking judgment in reconvention in the sum of $2,737.98 together with 5% interest from March 1, 1962 until paid and reasonable attorney fees and all costs.
The Trial Court, assigning written reasons therefor, rendered judgment “ * * rej ecting plaintiff’s demands at his costs in the main demand and in the reconventional demand judgment will be signed as prayed for.” Judgment was signed thereon in favor of Plaintiff in reconvention, South-land Resorts, Incorporated and against Defendant in reconvention, Donald T. Oatley, accordingly; from which judgment Donald T. Oatley appealed.
The factual situation involved in this case is the same as that involved in the case of Turner v. Southland Resorts, Incorporated, La.App.,
Reversed and rendered.