History
  • No items yet
midpage
O'Toole v. Denihan
114 Ohio St. 3d 1429
Ohio
2007
Check Treatment

Cuyahoga App. No. 87476, 2006-Ohio-6022. Reported at 113 Ohio St.3d 1465, 2007-Ohio-1722, 864 N.E.2d 652. On motions for reconsideration of Tallis George-Munro and Department of Children and Family Services, William Denihan, and Kamesha Duncan.

Motion of Tallis George-Munro is granted, and that appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Motion of Department of Children and Family Services, William Denihan, and Kamesha Duncan is granted in part, and that appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., would also accept that appeal on Proposition of Law No. TV. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

It is further ordered that the briefing schedule in this appeal is to begin de novo. Appellants shall file their briefs within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. VI.

Case Details

Case Name: O'Toole v. Denihan
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 20, 2007
Citation: 114 Ohio St. 3d 1429
Docket Number: 2007-0056
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.