O'Sullivan v. Minjae KimO'Sullivan v. Minjae Kim
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The damages awards for past and future pain and suffering do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see Ramirez v City of New York, 279 AD2d 563 [2001]; Berk v Schenck, 122 AD2d 823 [1986]).
Further, the award of punitive damages was supported by sufficient evidence since the defendant‘s conviction of assault in the second degree arising out of the same events as those alleged in this action established the appellant‘s civil liability for damages for negligently and/or recklessly causing the plaintiff‘s injuries (see Allstate Ins. Co. v Zuk, 78 NY2d 41 [1991]; D‘Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659 [1990]; Bazazian v Logatto, 299 AD2d 433, 434 [2002]).
The appellant‘s remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Miller, Adams and Skelos, JJ., concur.