In the Matter of KEVIN O‘NEILL, Petitioner, v CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
January 17, 2008
[859 NYS2d 183]
The penalty of termination for testing positive for marijuana during a random drug test under a zero tolerance policy in effect at the time of the decision does not shock the conscience (see Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827 [1991]; Matter of Kirk v City of New York, 47 AD3d 406 [2008]; Matter of McGovern v Safir, 266 AD2d 107 [1999]). Although petitioner alleges that changes have been made to the Fire Department‘s policy regarding marijuana usage subsequent to petitioner‘s termination, we reject petitioner‘s claim that the changes should be retroactively applied to his case (see Matter of Solomon v Department of Bldgs. of City of N.Y., 46 AD3d 370, 372 [2007]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
