History
  • No items yet
midpage
O'Herlihy v. . Joline
205 N.Y. 548
| NY | 1912
|
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and COLLIN, JJ.; HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ., dissent, on the ground that while plaintiff's counsel was guilty of misconduct on the trial, which would have justified the Appellate Division in reversing the judgment, they doubt that any error of law was presented which gives this court jurisdiction to reverse.

Case Details

Case Name: O'Herlihy v. . Joline
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 2, 1912
Citation: 205 N.Y. 548
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.