NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. VilaNYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Vila
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
A defendant seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see Quis v Bolden, 298 AD2d 375 [2002]; see
The remaining issues are not properly before this Court as they were either not determined by the order appealed from or are improperly advanced for the first time on appeal (see Weber v Jacobs, 289 AD2d 226, 227 [2001]; Rotundo v S&C Magnetic Resonance Imaging P.C., 255 AD2d 573, 574 [1998]).
Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.