History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nutter v. Varney
10 A. 615
| N.H. | 1887
|
Check Treatment

Ordinarily, questions relating to the allowance of costs are not open to revision at the law terms unless the question is referred to the law term by the presiding justice at the trial term. Sanborn v. Sanborn,41 N.H. 306; Bartlett v. Hodgdon, 44 N.H. 472; Smith v. Boynton,44 N.H. 529; Harvey v. Reeds, 49 N.H. 531. If the question is properly before us, we see no error in the allowance of costs at the trial term. The event of the suit was in favor of the plaintiff (Eastman v. Holderness,44 N.H. 18), and costs follow the event of every *Page 335 action or petition unless otherwise ordered by law or by the court. G. L., c. 233, s. 1.

Exceptions overruled.

CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Nutter v. Varney
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1887
Citation: 10 A. 615
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.