History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nuno v. Balz
265 So. 2d 10
Fla.
1972
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. *11We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Nuno v. Balz
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jun 28, 1972
Citation: 265 So. 2d 10
Docket Number: No. 41887
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.