Nowlin v. DavisNowlin v. Davis
In accordance with a 1997 jury verdict, a Fulton County trial court ordered Valesta Nowlin to convey certain real estate to Pamela Davis for the sum of $17,000. Several years later the conveyance had still not occurred, and Davis filed a petition for contempt. The trial court entered a second order mandating conveyance for the original $17,000 sum plus 12% interest since the date of the original judgment, and Nowlin appeals. Because the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in enforcing its original order, we affirm. 1
On February 13,1996, the parties entered into a contract for the sale of real estate in DeKalb County.
2
On April 29, 1996, Davis sued Nowlin for specific performance and breach of contract. On September 25,1997, the trial court entered judgment on the jury verdict and
ordered Nowlin to convey the
OCGA § 23-4-31 provides that “[a] superior court shall have full power to mold its decrees so as to meet the exigencies of each case and shall have full power to enforce its decrees when rendered.” In addition, “ ‘the discretion of the judges of the superior courts in all matters pertaining to contempt of their authority and mandates will never be controlled unless grossly abused.’ ” 3 4 In a similar case, we affirmed the use of a second decree to compel specific performance of an obligation to sell land, which decree also “made further direction concerning payment of the purchase price.” 5 Based on our review of the record and the trial court’s second order, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in balancing the equities and entering a second order requiring conveyance of the property in exchange for payment of the original sum plus interest, and refusing to order either party to reimburse the other for taxes, maintenance, or rental value related to the property. Therefore, we affirm.
Judgment affirmed.
Notes
Cases involving contempt of court are not within this Court’s appellate jurisdiction. See
Vines v. State,
Co-plaintiff appellee Rob Williams, Sr. was the real estate agent signing for the broker in this contract, and was added as a plaintiff in connection with the original lawsuit between the parties. See
Nowlin v. Davis,
Id. at 822-823.
R.R.R. Limited Partnership v. Recreational Svcs.,
Gallogly v. Bradco, Inc.,