History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nowell v. Neal
243 N.C. 175
N.C.
1955
Check Treatment
PER Cueiam.

After a protracted trial, involving the consideration of voluminous testimony, the jury resolved the controversial (first) issue in favor of defendant Neal. Careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, brought forward and argued in the brief filed in her behalf, discloses no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Nowell v. Neal
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 23, 1955
Citation: 243 N.C. 175
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.