History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nott v. Burgess
5 Haw. 420
Haw.
1885
Check Treatment

Opinion of the Full Court, by

Preston, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff against a decree made by the Chancellor, on the 22d day of June last, whereby he dismissed the bill for want of Equity.

On a perusal of the papers in the case and the opinion of the Chancellor, we think the decree was properly made; at the same time we adopt the principle stated by the Chancellor, as to the effect of a chattel mortgage upon the property comprised therein.

The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Nott v. Burgess
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 16, 1885
Citation: 5 Haw. 420
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.