History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norval v. Cornell
16 Johns. 73
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1819
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The only question is, whether the penalty was incurred or not. The case of Conkling v. Elting (2 Johns. Rep. 410.) is in point, that the 9th section of the act relative to turnpikes, (1 N.R. L. 234.) does not apply, or inflict a penalty, where toll is demanded of a person entitled to an exemption from paying it. It applies only to the hindering or delaying travellers and passengers bound to pay toll, or for taking more toll than the law allows.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Norval v. Cornell
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1819
Citation: 16 Johns. 73
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.